== Who is the "civil society" implementing this, and why? ==
# The Rights-Centric Education Network is a movement of individuals and organizations who believe that presently mainstreamed educational practices are not compatible with Child Rights (which is not surprising when we recognise that those educational practices predate the modern Human Rights discourse by centuries)
# Many members of the RCE Network are involved in educational environments where educational practices are more aligned with Human Rights (and especially Child Rights), and recognized the Quality Assurance System proposed by the UN as a powerful opportunity to bring democratic, rights-centric educational practices to the mainstream.

== I want to know more about the "Why" ==
# Watch the recording of the inauguration [https://youtu.be/gQDbwCNIeVE here]
# If you would like more details, watch the keynote by Sifaan Zavahir (a Founding Member of the RCE Network) at the International Democratic Education Conference 2025 held in Belgium on August 1-7. This presentation was mainly addressing the reasons why schools and families identifying as Democratic should be early adopters of the Quality Assurance System. See [https://www.eudec2025.org/mainstreaming-democratic-education/ Description] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnxknVKxOtw Recording].
# Watch the recording of a call hosted by Je'anna Clements (also a Founding Member) on the benefits of being an early adopter of the QAS [https://youtu.be/qux_1_cv14M here].

== Why should I participate in the RCE QAS? ==
# It affirms your commitment to the Rights of the Children in your educational environment.
# It gives confidence to the children in your care that you will do your best to respect and fulfill their Rights.
# It recognizes and showcases the good work that you do.
# It can help overcome opposition, and gain acceptance, from people who do not understand how what you do advances Children's Rights.

== How much does it cost to participate in the QAS? ==
Nothing. We want the QAS to be accessible for everyone, so we will never charge any fees.

== What do I do as a Participant? ==
# To the fullest extent possible, explain to the children you are working with why you are doing this (broadly, that they have human rights, and you want to ensure that their education respects and fulfils those rights as much as possible). A big part of realising children's rights is respecting their right to participate in decisions that affect them, and it is good to start that process by involving them in the decision to participate in the RCE QAS
# "Sign" the [https://rights-centric.education/pledge Pledge to join RCE Quality Assurance System] If you haven't already done so, the form will also allow you to
## Join the RCE Network; The QAS is offered by the RCE to its members, so membership is required - but don't worry, it's free :)
## Sign the [https://www.rights-centric.education/declaration Declaration of Child Rights-Centric Education]; The QAS exists to support the changes called for in the Declaration; so being a signatory is required.
# Make your first Report, which will outline what is the current situation in your environment in terms of child rights, and what have you done (or intend to do), to make things better.
# Submit further reports as and when possible (e.g. progress reports, or to describe a practice that you didn't have time to do before, or to update on a new initiative, etc.)
# When submitting reports, you are
## expected to implement certain practices called for in the First World Program for Human Rights Education, as and when possible
## encouraged to make use of the content of reports submitted by other Participants (that is how we share and make use of good practices from diverse contexts and countries)

== This reporting sounds like a lot of work / I'm worried I won't get it right ==
This is a participatory framework. There is no "right" or "wrong" way - rather, we will all help each other to be better. Let's start where we can, to the extent that we can, and just keep improving from there.

== How will this QAS actually "Assure Quality"? ==
Just like citizens in a democratic country will compare their experiences against their expectations (which will be informed by what they see happening in other countries) and engage in participatory practices (e.g. civil society action) to advance their rights, we envisage that children in educational settings participating in the QAS will compare their experiences with what is happening in other settings, and engage in participatory practices (e.g. dialogue with school leaders) to advance their rights.

== Is there any precedent for this? ==
We are drawing inspiration from several areas
# The reporting process that is part of every Human Rights treaty - if a country ratifies a treaty, they commit to report on their progress. (ChatGPT explanation for CRC [https://chatgpt.com/share/6854eed7-abcc-8013-9a4f-d53f6ea8e2a8 here]). Likewise, we expect that if a "school" (or other educational environment) signs up to be part of the QAS (because it gives them recognition for caring about Child Rights in Education and access to peer support) they will also make periodic reports on their progress.
## RCE QAS reports will be likewise public (see CRC related submissions in the UN repository [https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=5 here])
## Unlike the UN reporting process, there will NOT be a formal review process, because there is no authority that can conduct it. Instead, the accountability will be to the Rights-holders, i.e. the Children. These reports should be included in the democratic decision making processes in the school itself, and will empower children to hold adults accountable to their commitments
# The Forest School Association is an example of a network of schools coming together to organize their own [https://forestschoolassociation.org/forest-school-qualification/ Qualification System]
## Their path was to create a system where there is an authority above the schools that determines how well each school is performing.
## For the RCE QAS, we expect that it is the children in the school (or other environment) who should determine how well their school is performing in terms of respecting their rights (much like citizens decide how happy they are with their governments and express themselves through franchise)
## There can, of course, be independent accreditation / certification bodies that analyse / certify the reports (e.g. and show that school X has met 60% of their commitments while school Y has only met 40%) and provide supporting evidence (just like citizens in a democracy access information from a variety of sources)
# UNICEF's Rights-Respecting Schools Award (RRSA) is very similar in terms of goals, and their [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/how-we-create-change-for-children/theory-of-change/ Theory of Change] is useful (Thank you Don Berg for sharing this). Comparing QAS to RRSA:
## We too will have [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/resources/teaching-resources/best-practice-case-studies/ Case Studies]
## Unlike the RRSA, we will not start by accepting the presently mainstreamed system of schools as the baseline - that system was designed to violate, not advance, human rights and no amount of icing on top can fix it.
## Like in the comparison with Forest School, there will not be an authority that will set benchmarks (RRSA has Bronze, Silver, Gold levels)
## There will not be any participating fees.
## Derry Hannam shared [https://www.progressiveeducation.org/research-into-childrens-rights-education/ this article] he wrote for EUDEC about RRSA back in 2011. This gives more information on the background of the award and its impact.

== Suggested Additional Reading ==
# Children's rights group KRÄTZÄ published a "Human rights report", called "The Discrimination of The Child". It compared the real life (reality) of children in Germany with the provisions given by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). 16 of the 30 paragraphs weren't valid or adults/government didn't abide to them. The report was handed over to the President of Germany on the 50th Anniversary of the UDHR (1998). Among other things, it identifies the school system as the core area where human rights are being violated. Website (in German) [http://kraetzae.de/menschenrechtsreport/ here] and [https://en.kraetzae.de/hrreport/ here] (Thank you Mike Weimann for sharing this)
# KRÄTZÄ also wrote to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education when he visited Germany in 2006 (letter, in German, [https://kraetzae.de/schule/munoz/ here]) (Thanks again, Mike) - if it is possible to engage the SR in the QAS it would be great; in the past the SR's have grudgingly accepted home-schooling as an option to realise the Right to Education but are deeply skeptical about non-state Education. The QAS may help alleviate these fears

2025-11-25T06:25:14Z

Sifaan: /* I am not eligible to be a Participant, how can I help? */

The RCE Quality Assurance System (QAS) is a participatory mechanism supporting educational environments (schools, homes and others) to bring their practices into alignment with Child Rights. (Read more at [https://rights-centric.education/about-RCE-QAS website])

'''The RCE QAS was inaugurated on Nov 20th, 2025''', recording available [https://youtu.be/gQDbwCNIeVE here].

== Who is the "civil society" implementing this, and why? ==
# The Rights-Centric Education Network is a movement of individuals and organizations who believe that presently mainstreamed educational practices are not compatible with Child Rights (which is not surprising when we recognise that those educational practices predate the modern Human Rights discourse by centuries)
# Many members of the RCE Network are involved in educational environments where educational practices are more aligned with Human Rights (and especially Child Rights), and recognized the Quality Assurance System proposed by the UN as a powerful opportunity to bring democratic, rights-centric educational practices to the mainstream.

== I want to know more about the "Why" ==
# Watch the recording of the inauguration [https://youtu.be/gQDbwCNIeVE here]
# If you would like more details, watch the keynote by Sifaan Zavahir (a Founding Member of the RCE Network) at the International Democratic Education Conference 2025 held in Belgium on August 1-7. This presentation was mainly addressing the reasons why schools and families identifying as Democratic should be early adopters of the Quality Assurance System. See [https://www.eudec2025.org/mainstreaming-democratic-education/ Description] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnxknVKxOtw Recording].
# Watch the recording of a call hosted by Je'anna Clements (also a Founding Member) on the benefits of being an early adopter of the QAS [https://youtu.be/qux_1_cv14M here].

== Why should I participate in the RCE QAS? ==
# It affirms your commitment to the Rights of the Children in your educational environment.
# It gives confidence to the children in your care that you will do your best to respect and fulfill their Rights.
# It recognizes and showcases the good work that you do.
# It can help overcome opposition, and gain acceptance, from people who do not understand how what you do advances Children's Rights.

== How much does it cost to participate in the QAS? ==
Nothing. We want the QAS to be accessible for everyone, so we will never charge any fees.

== Who can Participate in the RCE QAS ==
Please see [https://rights-centric.education/rce-qas-participants RCE QAS Participants]

== I am not eligible to be a Participant, how can I help? ==
Please see [https://rights-centric.education/qas-advisors RCE QAS Advisors]

== What do I do as a Participant? ==
# To the fullest extent possible, explain to the children you are working with why you are doing this (broadly, that they have human rights, and you want to ensure that their education respects and fulfils those rights as much as possible). A big part of realising children's rights is respecting their right to participate in decisions that affect them, and it is good to start that process by involving them in the decision to participate in the RCE QAS
# "Sign" the [https://rights-centric.education/pledge Pledge to join RCE Quality Assurance System] If you haven't already done so, the form will also allow you to
## Join the RCE Network; The QAS is offered by the RCE to its members, so membership is required - but don't worry, it's free :)
## Sign the [https://www.rights-centric.education/declaration Declaration of Child Rights-Centric Education]; The QAS exists to support the changes called for in the Declaration; so being a signatory is required.
# Make your first Report, which will outline what is the current situation in your environment in terms of child rights, and what have you done (or intend to do), to make things better.
# Submit further reports as and when possible (e.g. progress reports, or to describe a practice that you didn't have time to do before, or to update on a new initiative, etc.)
# When submitting reports, you are
## expected to implement certain practices called for in the First World Program for Human Rights Education, as and when possible
## encouraged to make use of the content of reports submitted by other Participants (that is how we share and make use of good practices from diverse contexts and countries)

== This reporting sounds like a lot of work / I'm worried I won't get it right ==
This is a participatory framework. There is no "right" or "wrong" way - rather, we will all help each other to be better. Let's start where we can, to the extent that we can, and just keep improving from there.

== How will this QAS actually "Assure Quality"? ==
Just like citizens in a democratic country will compare their experiences against their expectations (which will be informed by what they see happening in other countries) and engage in participatory practices (e.g. civil society action) to advance their rights, we envisage that children in educational settings participating in the QAS will compare their experiences with what is happening in other settings, and engage in participatory practices (e.g. dialogue with school leaders) to advance their rights.

== Is there any precedent for this? ==
We are drawing inspiration from several areas
# The reporting process that is part of every Human Rights treaty - if a country ratifies a treaty, they commit to report on their progress. (ChatGPT explanation for CRC [https://chatgpt.com/share/6854eed7-abcc-8013-9a4f-d53f6ea8e2a8 here]). Likewise, we expect that if a "school" (or other educational environment) signs up to be part of the QAS (because it gives them recognition for caring about Child Rights in Education and access to peer support) they will also make periodic reports on their progress.
## RCE QAS reports will be likewise public (see CRC related submissions in the UN repository [https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=5 here])
## Unlike the UN reporting process, there will NOT be a formal review process, because there is no authority that can conduct it. Instead, the accountability will be to the Rights-holders, i.e. the Children. These reports should be included in the democratic decision making processes in the school itself, and will empower children to hold adults accountable to their commitments
# The Forest School Association is an example of a network of schools coming together to organize their own [https://forestschoolassociation.org/forest-school-qualification/ Qualification System]
## Their path was to create a system where there is an authority above the schools that determines how well each school is performing.
## For the RCE QAS, we expect that it is the children in the school (or other environment) who should determine how well their school is performing in terms of respecting their rights (much like citizens decide how happy they are with their governments and express themselves through franchise)
## There can, of course, be independent accreditation / certification bodies that analyse / certify the reports (e.g. and show that school X has met 60% of their commitments while school Y has only met 40%) and provide supporting evidence (just like citizens in a democracy access information from a variety of sources)
# UNICEF's Rights-Respecting Schools Award (RRSA) is very similar in terms of goals, and their [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/how-we-create-change-for-children/theory-of-change/ Theory of Change] is useful (Thank you Don Berg for sharing this). Comparing QAS to RRSA:
## We too will have [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/resources/teaching-resources/best-practice-case-studies/ Case Studies]
## Unlike the RRSA, we will not start by accepting the presently mainstreamed system of schools as the baseline - that system was designed to violate, not advance, human rights and no amount of icing on top can fix it.
## Like in the comparison with Forest School, there will not be an authority that will set benchmarks (RRSA has Bronze, Silver, Gold levels)
## There will not be any participating fees.
## Derry Hannam shared [https://www.progressiveeducation.org/research-into-childrens-rights-education/ this article] he wrote for EUDEC about RRSA back in 2011. This gives more information on the background of the award and its impact.

== Suggested Additional Reading ==
# Children's rights group KRÄTZÄ published a "Human rights report", called "The Discrimination of The Child". It compared the real life (reality) of children in Germany with the provisions given by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). 16 of the 30 paragraphs weren't valid or adults/government didn't abide to them. The report was handed over to the President of Germany on the 50th Anniversary of the UDHR (1998). Among other things, it identifies the school system as the core area where human rights are being violated. Website (in German) [http://kraetzae.de/menschenrechtsreport/ here] and [https://en.kraetzae.de/hrreport/ here] (Thank you Mike Weimann for sharing this)
# KRÄTZÄ also wrote to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education when he visited Germany in 2006 (letter, in German, [https://kraetzae.de/schule/munoz/ here]) (Thanks again, Mike) - if it is possible to engage the SR in the QAS it would be great; in the past the SR's have grudgingly accepted home-schooling as an option to realise the Right to Education but are deeply skeptical about non-state Education. The QAS may help alleviate these fears

RCE Quality Assurance System

2025-11-25T06:15:52Z

Sifaan:

The RCE Quality Assurance System (QAS) is a participatory mechanism supporting educational environments (schools, homes and others) to bring their practices into alignment with Child Rights. (Read more at [https://rights-centric.education/about-RCE-QAS website])

'''The RCE QAS was inaugurated on Nov 20th, 2025''', recording available [https://youtu.be/gQDbwCNIeVE here].

== Who is the "civil society" implementing this, and why? ==
# The Rights-Centric Education Network is a movement of individuals and organizations who believe that presently mainstreamed educational practices are not compatible with Child Rights (which is not surprising when we recognise that those educational practices predate the modern Human Rights discourse by centuries)
# Many members of the RCE Network are involved in educational environments where educational practices are more aligned with Human Rights (and especially Child Rights), and recognized the Quality Assurance System proposed by the UN as a powerful opportunity to bring democratic, rights-centric educational practices to the mainstream.

== I want to know more about the "Why" ==
# Watch the recording of the inauguration [https://youtu.be/gQDbwCNIeVE here]
# If you would like more details, watch the keynote by Sifaan Zavahir (a Founding Member of the RCE Network) at the International Democratic Education Conference 2025 held in Belgium on August 1-7. This presentation was mainly addressing the reasons why schools and families identifying as Democratic should be early adopters of the Quality Assurance System. See [https://www.eudec2025.org/mainstreaming-democratic-education/ Description] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnxknVKxOtw Recording].
# Watch the recording of a call hosted by Je'anna Clements (also a Founding Member) on the benefits of being an early adopter of the QAS [https://youtu.be/qux_1_cv14M here].

== Why should I participate in the RCE QAS? ==
# It affirms your commitment to the Rights of the Children in your educational environment.
# It gives confidence to the children in your care that you will do your best to respect and fulfill their Rights.
# It recognizes and showcases the good work that you do.
# It can help overcome opposition, and gain acceptance, from people who do not understand how what you do advances Children's Rights.

== How much does it cost to participate in the QAS? ==
Nothing. We want the QAS to be accessible for everyone, so we will never charge any fees.

== Who can Participate in the RCE QAS ==
Please see [https://rights-centric.education/rce-qas-participants RCE QAS Participants]

== I am not eligible to be a Participant, how can I help? ==
Please see [[RCE QAS Advisors]]

== What do I do as a Participant? ==
# To the fullest extent possible, explain to the children you are working with why you are doing this (broadly, that they have human rights, and you want to ensure that their education respects and fulfils those rights as much as possible). A big part of realising children's rights is respecting their right to participate in decisions that affect them, and it is good to start that process by involving them in the decision to participate in the RCE QAS
# "Sign" the [https://rights-centric.education/pledge Pledge to join RCE Quality Assurance System] If you haven't already done so, the form will also allow you to
## Join the RCE Network; The QAS is offered by the RCE to its members, so membership is required - but don't worry, it's free :)
## Sign the [https://www.rights-centric.education/declaration Declaration of Child Rights-Centric Education]; The QAS exists to support the changes called for in the Declaration; so being a signatory is required.
# Make your first Report, which will outline what is the current situation in your environment in terms of child rights, and what have you done (or intend to do), to make things better.
# Submit further reports as and when possible (e.g. progress reports, or to describe a practice that you didn't have time to do before, or to update on a new initiative, etc.)
# When submitting reports, you are
## expected to implement certain practices called for in the First World Program for Human Rights Education, as and when possible
## encouraged to make use of the content of reports submitted by other Participants (that is how we share and make use of good practices from diverse contexts and countries)

== This reporting sounds like a lot of work / I'm worried I won't get it right ==
This is a participatory framework. There is no "right" or "wrong" way - rather, we will all help each other to be better. Let's start where we can, to the extent that we can, and just keep improving from there.

== How will this QAS actually "Assure Quality"? ==
Just like citizens in a democratic country will compare their experiences against their expectations (which will be informed by what they see happening in other countries) and engage in participatory practices (e.g. civil society action) to advance their rights, we envisage that children in educational settings participating in the QAS will compare their experiences with what is happening in other settings, and engage in participatory practices (e.g. dialogue with school leaders) to advance their rights.

== Is there any precedent for this? ==
We are drawing inspiration from several areas
# The reporting process that is part of every Human Rights treaty - if a country ratifies a treaty, they commit to report on their progress. (ChatGPT explanation for CRC [https://chatgpt.com/share/6854eed7-abcc-8013-9a4f-d53f6ea8e2a8 here]). Likewise, we expect that if a "school" (or other educational environment) signs up to be part of the QAS (because it gives them recognition for caring about Child Rights in Education and access to peer support) they will also make periodic reports on their progress.
## RCE QAS reports will be likewise public (see CRC related submissions in the UN repository [https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=5 here])
## Unlike the UN reporting process, there will NOT be a formal review process, because there is no authority that can conduct it. Instead, the accountability will be to the Rights-holders, i.e. the Children. These reports should be included in the democratic decision making processes in the school itself, and will empower children to hold adults accountable to their commitments
# The Forest School Association is an example of a network of schools coming together to organize their own [https://forestschoolassociation.org/forest-school-qualification/ Qualification System]
## Their path was to create a system where there is an authority above the schools that determines how well each school is performing.
## For the RCE QAS, we expect that it is the children in the school (or other environment) who should determine how well their school is performing in terms of respecting their rights (much like citizens decide how happy they are with their governments and express themselves through franchise)
## There can, of course, be independent accreditation / certification bodies that analyse / certify the reports (e.g. and show that school X has met 60% of their commitments while school Y has only met 40%) and provide supporting evidence (just like citizens in a democracy access information from a variety of sources)
# UNICEF's Rights-Respecting Schools Award (RRSA) is very similar in terms of goals, and their [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/how-we-create-change-for-children/theory-of-change/ Theory of Change] is useful (Thank you Don Berg for sharing this). Comparing QAS to RRSA:
## We too will have [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/resources/teaching-resources/best-practice-case-studies/ Case Studies]
## Unlike the RRSA, we will not start by accepting the presently mainstreamed system of schools as the baseline - that system was designed to violate, not advance, human rights and no amount of icing on top can fix it.
## Like in the comparison with Forest School, there will not be an authority that will set benchmarks (RRSA has Bronze, Silver, Gold levels)
## There will not be any participating fees.
## Derry Hannam shared [https://www.progressiveeducation.org/research-into-childrens-rights-education/ this article] he wrote for EUDEC about RRSA back in 2011. This gives more information on the background of the award and its impact.

== Suggested Additional Reading ==
# Children's rights group KRÄTZÄ published a "Human rights report", called "The Discrimination of The Child". It compared the real life (reality) of children in Germany with the provisions given by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). 16 of the 30 paragraphs weren't valid or adults/government didn't abide to them. The report was handed over to the President of Germany on the 50th Anniversary of the UDHR (1998). Among other things, it identifies the school system as the core area where human rights are being violated. Website (in German) [http://kraetzae.de/menschenrechtsreport/ here] and [https://en.kraetzae.de/hrreport/ here] (Thank you Mike Weimann for sharing this)
# KRÄTZÄ also wrote to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education when he visited Germany in 2006 (letter, in German, [https://kraetzae.de/schule/munoz/ here]) (Thanks again, Mike) - if it is possible to engage the SR in the QAS it would be great; in the past the SR's have grudgingly accepted home-schooling as an option to realise the Right to Education but are deeply skeptical about non-state Education. The QAS may help alleviate these fears

RCE Quality Assurance System

2025-11-25T05:56:10Z

Sifaan:

The RCE Quality Assurance System (QAS) is a participatory mechanism supporting educational environments (schools, homes and others) to bring their practices into alignment with Child Rights. (Read more at [https://rights-centric.education/about-RCE-QAS website])

'''The RCE QAS was inaugurated on Nov 20th, 2025''', recording available [https://youtu.be/gQDbwCNIeVE here].

== Who is the "civil society" implementing this, and why? ==
# The Rights-Centric Education Network is a movement of individuals and organizations who believe that presently mainstreamed educational practices are not compatible with Child Rights (which is not surprising when we recognise that those educational practices predate the modern Human Rights discourse by centuries)
# Many members of the RCE Network are involved in educational environments where educational practices are more aligned with Human Rights (and especially Child Rights), and recognized the Quality Assurance System proposed by the UN as a powerful opportunity to bring democratic, rights-centric educational practices to the mainstream.

== I want to know more about the "Why" ==
# Watch the first hour (2nd hour is Q&A) of the keynote by Sifaan Zavahir (a Founding Member of the RCE Network) at the International Democratic Education Conference 2025 held in Belgium on August 1-7. This presentation was mainly addressing the reasons why schools and families identifying as Democratic should be early adopters of the Quality Assurance System. See [https://www.eudec2025.org/mainstreaming-democratic-education/ Description] and [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnxknVKxOtw Recording].
# Watch the recording of a call hosted by Je'anna Clements (also a Founding Member) on the benefits of being an early adopter of the QAS [https://youtu.be/qux_1_cv14M here].

== Why should I participate in the RCE QAS ==
# It affirms your commitment to the Rights of the Children in your educational environment.
# It gives confidence to the children in your care that you will do your best to respect and fulfill their Rights.
# It recognizes and showcases the good work that you do.
# It can help overcome opposition, and gain acceptance, from people who do not understand how what you do advances Children's Rights.

== How much does it cost to participate in the QAS? ==
Nothing. We want the QAS to be accessible for everyone, so we will never charge any fees.

== Who can Participate in the RCE QAS ==
Please see [[RCE QAS Participants]]

== I am not eligible to be a Participant, how can I help? ==
Please see [[RCE QAS Advisors]]

== What do I do as a Participant? ==
# To the fullest extent possible, explain to the children you are working with why you are doing this (broadly, that they have human rights, and you want to ensure that their education respects and fulfils those rights as much as possible). A big part of realising children's rights is respecting their right to participate in decisions that affect them, and it is good to start that process by involving them in the decision to participate in the RCE QAS
# "Sign" the [[Pledge to join RCE Quality Assurance System|Pledge]] to join the QAS. {{highlight round|Text of the Pledge has been updated recently. Please review.}}. If you haven't already done so, the form will also allow you to
## Join the RCE Network; The QAS is offered by the RCE to its members, so membership is required - but don't worry, it's free :)
## Sign the [https://www.rights-centric.education/declaration Declaration of Child Rights-Centric Education]; The QAS exists to support the changes called for in the Declaration; so being a signatory is required.
# Make your first Report, which will outline what is the current situation in your environment in terms of child rights, and what have you done (or intend to do), to make things better.
# Submit further reports as and when possible (e.g. progress reports, or to describe a practice that you didn't have time to do before, or to update on a new initiative, etc.)
# When submitting reports, you are
## expected to implement certain practices called for in the First World Program for Human Rights Education, as and when possible
## encouraged to make use of the content of reports submitted by other Participants (that is how we share and make use of good practices from diverse contexts and countries)

== This reporting sounds like a lot of work / I'm worried I won't get it right ==
This is a participatory framework. There is no "right" or "wrong" way - rather, we will all help each other to be better. Let's start where we can, to the extent that we can, and just keep improving from there.

== How will this QAS actually "Assure Quality"? ==
Just like citizens in a democratic country will compare their experiences against their expectations (which will be informed by what they see happening in other countries) and engage in participatory practices (e.g. civil society action) to advance their rights, we envisage that children in educational settings participating in the QAS will compare their experiences with what is happening in other settings, and engage in participatory practices (e.g. dialogue with school leaders) to advance their rights.

== Is there any precedent for this? ==
We are drawing inspiration from several areas
# The reporting process that is part of every Human Rights treaty - if a country ratifies a treaty, they commit to report on their progress. (ChatGPT explanation for CRC [https://chatgpt.com/share/6854eed7-abcc-8013-9a4f-d53f6ea8e2a8 here]). Likewise, we expect that if a "school" (or other educational environment) signs up to be part of the QAS (because it gives them recognition for caring about Child Rights in Education and access to peer support) they will also make periodic reports on their progress.
## RCE QAS reports will be likewise public (see CRC related submissions in the UN repository [https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/treatybodyexternal/TBSearch.aspx?Lang=en&TreatyID=5 here])
## Unlike the UN reporting process, there will NOT be a formal review process, because there is no authority that can conduct it. Instead, the accountability will be to the Rights-holders, i.e. the Children. These reports should be included in the democratic decision making processes in the school itself, and will empower children to hold adults accountable to their commitments
# The Forest School Association is an example of a network of schools coming together to organize their own [https://forestschoolassociation.org/forest-school-qualification/ Qualification System]
## Their path was to create a system where there is an authority above the schools that determines how well each school is performing.
## For the RCE QAS, we expect that it is the children in the school (or other environment) who should determine how well their school is performing in terms of respecting their rights (much like citizens decide how happy they are with their governments and express themselves through franchise)
## There can, of course, be independent accreditation / certification bodies that analyse / certify the reports (e.g. and show that school X has met 60% of their commitments while school Y has only met 40%) and provide supporting evidence (just like citizens in a democracy access information from a variety of sources)
# UNICEF's Rights-Respecting Schools Award (RRSA) is very similar in terms of goals, and their [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/how-we-create-change-for-children/theory-of-change/ Theory of Change] is useful (Thank you Don Berg for sharing this). Comparing QAS to RRSA:
## We too will have [https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/resources/teaching-resources/best-practice-case-studies/ Case Studies]
## Unlike the RRSA, we will not start by accepting the presently mainstreamed system of schools as the baseline - that system was designed to violate, not advance, human rights and no amount of icing on top can fix it.
## Like in the comparison with Forest School, there will not be an authority that will set benchmarks (RRSA has Bronze, Silver, Gold levels)
## There will not be any participating fees.
## Derry Hannam shared [https://www.progressiveeducation.org/research-into-childrens-rights-education/ this article] he wrote for EUDEC about RRSA back in 2011. This gives more information on the background of the award and its impact.

== Suggested Additional Reading ==
# Children's rights group KRÄTZÄ published a "Human rights report", called "The Discrimination of The Child". It compared the real life (reality) of children in Germany with the provisions given by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). 16 of the 30 paragraphs weren't valid or adults/government didn't abide to them. The report was handed over to the President of Germany on the 50th Anniversary of the UDHR (1998). Among other things, it identifies the school system as the core area where human rights are being violated. Website (in German) [http://kraetzae.de/menschenrechtsreport/ here] and [https://en.kraetzae.de/hrreport/ here] (Thank you Mike Weimann for sharing this)
# KRÄTZÄ also wrote to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education when he visited Germany in 2006 (letter, in German, [https://kraetzae.de/schule/munoz/ here]) (Thanks again, Mike) - if it is possible to engage the SR in the QAS it would be great; in the past the SR's have grudgingly accepted home-schooling as an option to realise the Right to Education but are deeply skeptical about non-state Education. The QAS may help alleviate these fears

RCE QAS Terms and Conditions

2025-11-12T20:51:22Z

Sifaan:

== About ==
These are the proposed Terms and Conditions for Participating in the RCE Quality Assurance System.

== Terms and Conditions ==
# The Rights-Centric Education (RCE) Quality Assurance System (QAS) is a Program offered by the RCE Network in accordance with its [http://rights-centric.education/articles Articles of Association].
# These Terms and Conditions may be amended by the Participants by following the consent-based decision making procedure described in the Articles of Association.
# Participation in the RCE QAS is voluntary, and shall require membership of the RCE Network and signing the Declaration of Child Rights-Centric Education (2024).
# There shall not be any fees charged for Participation
# All information provided to the RCE QAS may be published, including personal information. Participants who wish to remain anonymous are advised to use pseudonyms, use non-identifiable email addresses, and not provide details such as social media handles, websites, etc.
# Participants agree to submit information which is true and accurate, to the best of their knowledge.
# The RCE Network shall publish information received in good faith, and does not audit/certify/verify/validate the accuracy of the information received.
# When submitting information sourced from children (e.g. results of a survey of children, testimonials, etc.), Participants agree to
## Not include names of children (use pseudonyms)
## Only provide personal information (including but not limited to ethnicity, religion, family status, citizenship status, disability, age, gender, sex, sexual orientation) if it is necessary for understanding the context of the information
## Ensure that children participate voluntarily, with informed consent on how the information will be published (possibly including consent from Parents/Guardians). Signed consent is recommended.
## Participants agree to only submit photographs / videos if all participants consent to the photographs / videos being published. Signed consent is recommended.
# Participants may withdraw from the RCE QAS at any time, by sending a request to network@rights-centric.education. In such an event, information provided by participants to the RCE QAS may be retained, and remain on public display (except for personal information, which shall be removed)

2025-11-09T15:38:17Z

Sifaan: Created page with "If you are interested in supporting the RCE Quality Assurance System but do not qualify to be a Participant, for example because you are an Academic/Researcher who does not directly work with Children in realising their Right to Education, or you are retired, etc. you can support the QAS as an Advisor. How advisors will engage is not defined yet, but we expect that # They will contribute their ideas by participating in discussions on the RCE..."